Ryan R. Simatic
Attorney
-
Telephone
-
Fax
(414) 238-6579
-
Office
Milwaukee
411 East Wisconsin Avenue
Suite 1000
Milwaukee, WI 53202
Ryan Simatic has focused his practice on eminent domain since 2011. He has handled multiple jury trials and evidentiary hearings with property damages ranging from $50,000 to $50 million. In addition to being admitted to practice law in six states, he has also been admitted pro hac vice to practice for clients in Alaska, Florida, Indiana, Ohio, South Carolina and Tennessee. He has considerable experience at the appellate level, having argued cases with full or partial success before Minnesota and North Dakota Supreme Courts and Minnesota and Tennessee Courts of Appeals.
In addition to eminent domain cases, Ryan has tried or resolved a wide range of real estate disputes involving easements, boundaries, adverse possession, land use and zoning, property tax valuation and property tax exemptions.
In his spare time, Ryan enjoys playing guitar, his dogs, and travel. He is also a member of the Lions Club.
- William Mitchell College of Law, J.D., magna cum laude, 2011
- University of Minnesota, B.A., 2006
- Wisconsin
- Minnesota
- North Dakota
- Arizona
- Idaho
- New York
- Washington
- U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, Western District of Wisconsin
- Pro hac vice admissions in State, U.S. District, Appellate and Supreme Courts throughout the United States
- Harvey v. Shelby Cnty., No. W2022-683-COAR3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. July 28, 2023) (preserving client’s right to sue the City of Memphis for inverse condemnation).”
- Cnty. of Scott v. Johnston, 841 N.W.2d 357 (Minn. Ct. App. 2013) (Minnesota Court of Appeals reversing trial court and awarding additional attorneys fees to landowner in eminent domain case).
- State ex rel. Comm’r of Transp. v. Johnson, No. A13-0429 (Minn. Ct. App. Sept. 22, 2014) (Minnesota Court of Appeals affirming trial court’s award of attorneys fees to landowner).
- KCP Hastings, LLC v. Cty. of Dakota, 868 N.W.2d 268 (Minn. 2015) (Minnesota Supreme Court holding that sole reliance on the sales comparison approach to value for an income producing, multitenant property is clear error).
- County of Hennepin v. Bhakta, 922 NW 2d 194 (Minn. 2019) (Minnesota Supreme Court holding that pretrial motions preserved issues for appellate review).